[ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging drop

- Protein crystallography

Main steps:

- Protein purification
- Crystallisation

Special:

- Programs for crystallography
- X-ray detectors

Basic tutorials:

   - Chemistry
   - Protein
   - Peptide
   - Amino Acids

Xtal community:

- CCP4BB

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Building PEG-400 in Coot
From: junfeng liu jliu {- at -} NIMR {- dot -} MRC {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2009-04-22

Next message:
Subject: Re: microbatch vs hanging drop
From: Kris Tesh Kris {- dot -} Tesh {- at -} RIGAKU {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-22

Subject: microbatch vs hanging drop
From: rui ruisher {- at -} GMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-22

Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but it
requires the buffer quite a lot, > 600uL? Microbatch can save buffers,only
100uL is required, and also can hold up to three samples in the sitting
well. Other than saving the buffer, what's the advantage of microbatch?
Which method will be easier to get crystals or no big difference? Thanks for
sharing.

R

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Building PEG-400 in Coot
From: junfeng liu jliu {- at -} NIMR {- dot -} MRC {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2009-04-22

Next message:
Subject: Re: microbatch vs hanging drop
From: Kris Tesh Kris {- dot -} Tesh {- at -} RIGAKU {- dot -} COM
Date: 2009-04-22