| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | Advert | | |
Re: [ccp4bb] Computer hardware and OS "survey" |
||
- Protein crystallographyMain steps:- Protein purification- Crystallisation Special:- Programs for crystallography- X-ray detectors Basic tutorials:- Chemistry- Protein - Peptide - Amino Acids Xtal community:- CCP4BB |
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999Subject: Re: Computer hardware and OS "survey" From: Engin Ozkan eozkan {- at -} STANFORD {- dot -} EDU Date: 2009-05-01 If you have found Bill Scott's pages on Macs useful, you may find his Ubuntu pages similarly useful: another reason to go with linux over windows. There are also people creating rpm packages to easily install the likes of coot on Fedora/RHEL/Centos, another well supported option. Also, phenix, which seems to have significant popularity these days, does not run on windows. Engin On 5/1/09 7:58 AM, Roger Rowlett wrote: > Well, Coot, O, Pymol, CNS, and CCP4i, as well as Open-EPMR all have > Windows versions. The main issues with a Windows workflow are (1) jobs > will run significantly slower than in Linux, and (2) the DOS command > shell is not as powerful as Linux, although it can be extended by > installing DOS versions of Linux commands and utilities. You will also > lose access to a number of Linux(Unix)-only XRD tools, but those are > getting fewer each year. It's also easier, more stable, and more > secure to set up a laboratory data server in Linux than in Windows. > You will also find that you can get excellent computing performance > out of fairly modest hardware in Linux compared to Windows. > > I'm not sure there is much "institutional support" required for Linux > if you know how to install your own OS and software. All I need from > my networking people is a hole in the firewall for my MAC address and > SSH port. After that, there is not much for IT to do for me other than > stay out of the way. Ubuntu has made it a lot easier than it has been > to maintain your own Linux systems, but I'm still currently wedded to > Fedora. The main Linux headache is hardware support, especially > printers and graphics drivers for Nvidia cards, but even that is > relatively painless now. > > Cheers, > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Roger S. Rowlett > Professor > Colgate University Presidential Scholar > Department of Chemistry > Colgate University > 13 Oak Drive > Hamilton, NY 13346 > > tel: (315)-228-7245 > ofc: (315)-228-7395 > fax: (315)-228-7935 > email: rrowlett@mail.colgate.edu > > Link,Todd M wrote: >> My home institution, in effort to cut costs, is making an effort to >> push those of us on Macs onto PCs. Up till now they have been very >> generous via a lease program for computer hardware, but that is >> changing given the current economics. The institution currently does >> not support Linux so we are limited to Mac and Windows OS. >> >> We certainly make use of William Scotts crystallography on OS X >> (thanks so much!) so our main argument is that we would have far >> more support “out there” for crystallography on the Mac than we would >> have for on Windows. But to be fair (and hopefully bolster our >> argument) I should find out if that is true. I did not find an equal >> web support page for Windows. >> >> A volunteer survey will be distorted (probably by Mac fanboys like >> me) so I am asking for peoples best guesstimate as to what % use of >> Mac, Windows, or Linux is out there for data processing and model >> building. Our core programs are coot, o, pymol, cns, and ccp4 but we >> certainly make occasional use of other crystallography programs out >> there (solve, epmr...) >> >> Also what are the relative crystallography support for Mac vs. Windows. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Todd >> >> >> -- >> Todd M. Link >> Assistant Professor >> MD Anderson Cancer Center >> Univ. of Texas >> >> (713) 834-6394 >> > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 1999 <-- November 1999 <-- 30 November 1999 |
|
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2010 by Quid United Ltd |